Price index · August 2026

The UK Vintage Camera Price Index — August 2026

Across 82 camera models with at least 4 UK saleroom sales in each of two twelve-month periods, the median price fell 5.7% in the year to 31 July 2026, against the year before. That figure rests on 1,608 sales.

−5.7%median change, year on year
82models compared
1,608sales behind it
34 / 46models up / down

Follow new editions (RSS feed)

34 of those models were worth more than a year earlier and 46 were worth less. Every row below shows the number of sales it rests on in both periods, so you can judge which lines to believe. Where a model is thin, treat it as an anecdote rather than a trend.

Covering sales to 31 July 2026.

Welcome to the first Cameraworth Report. Cameraworth is an open price guide for used cameras: what they actually sold for, free to read, with the method published alongside it. If there is a camera or a question you want covered, tell us. Reader interest is how we choose what to dig into next.

The number

Used camera prices in the UK are softening. The typical collectable camera sold at UK auction in the twelve months to July 2026 went for 5.7% less than the same camera a year earlier, across 1,608 sales of 82 models.

It is a drift rather than a slump, and it is not new. Prices have been easing for the best part of three years — negative in thirty of the thirty-six months we have measured.

Breadth

It is not one market, though. Of the 82 models, 46 were worth less than a year earlier, 34 more and 2 the same — the fall is wide but shallow. What it really depends on is the kind of camera:

Group Change Pattern over the year
35mm SLRs −7.3% negative every month since September 2025
35mm compacts −8.5% no pattern; it jumps about
Medium format −3.5% flat all year, averaging −0.4%
35mm rangefinders +5.6% up three months running, after six near −18%
Only moves larger than a camera’s normal year-to-year swing are named below.

Really this is an SLR story: they are the only group falling steadily. Rangefinders are the one group that has turned.

Inside the SLR fall: Nikon

SLRs took most of the fall, so we looked at Nikon to see what was happening inside it.

All seven of Nikon’s professional bodies were worth less than a year ago — down 17.6%, against 5.7% for cameras generally — and the cheaper enthusiast bodies did much the same, down 16.2%. It is not a story about autofocus going out of fashion: the manual F, F2 and F3 fell alongside the autofocus F4 and F5.

The two ends are converging: the F3 fell, the FM rose.

Last year This year
F3 — professional £271 £216
FM — enthusiast £84 £120

A year ago an F3 cost more than three times an FM. Now it costs less than twice.

Canon’s SLRs fell too, but nothing like as far

Canon’s most-traded film SLRs got the same test. They moved down, but not far: the group is off 6.9%, against 16.2% for Nikon’s equivalent cameras.

Last year This year
A-1 £88 £87
AE-1 £75 £70
F-1 £175 £163
AE-1 Program £75 £66

Only the AE-1 Program shifted further than it usually does in a year. The rest sit inside their normal range, and that is the finding: a Canon SLR is worth about what it was worth last summer, and a Nikon is not.

Pocket cameras fell, but not Olympus’s

Across all makes, 35mm compacts fell 8.5% over the year — and that figure already includes Olympus, whose own pocket cameras were worth 17.6% more than a year earlier. Its OM SLRs, meanwhile, did not move at all as a group, and the cheapest of them fell.

Last year This year
XA-2 — pocket £50 £69
Mju II — pocket £168 £225
OM-10 — SLR £62 £50

What rose was Olympus’s, not the pocket camera.

What came up in July

Almost all of July went through one room: 163 of the month’s 168 lots were sold by Flints on 7 July, so this is one auction’s month, not the market’s.

The top lot was a Zeh Zeca-Flex at £575, a 1930s German folding twin-lens — thirteen sales in twenty-eight years of records. A Gandolfi tailboard made £375, also thirteen sales in that time, and a Paillard Bolex H-16 Reflex cine camera £562, from ten. Familiar things at familiar money: a Nikon 35Ti at £362, a Canon IVSb at £312, a Leitz IIIf at £350.

Two of the better prices were not cameras: a Leitz Focomat V35 enlarger at £562 and a Kodak Aero-Ektar lens at £350. The month’s biggest price was not in a saleroom at all — a Nikon 800mm f/5.6 lens on eBay, £5,587.

None of these enter the figures above; they are simply what the month looked like.

What we’re watching

After six months near −18%, rangefinders’ last three were positive, ending the year up 5.6%. The climb off the bottom is bigger than that group normally manages; the level it has reached is not. Does a fourth month hold above zero? We will report the same figure.

A few others we will put the same question to:

  • Does the gap between Nikon’s F3 and FM carry on closing?
  • Do Olympus’s pocket cameras hold what they gained, or was it a good run of examples?
  • Canon’s SLRs have sat still for a year. Do they stay there while Nikon’s fall?

We are also working back through older auction results, so a later edition can show ten years rather than one.

Cite this

The Cameraworth Report, August 2026 (covering sales to 31 July 2026). Camley Photographic Limited.
https://www.cameraworth.com/reports/2026-08/

How these figures are put together, what the data covers, and where it falls short: cameraworth.com/methodology

Reading the figure. The twelve-month windows overlap, so “negative in thirty of the thirty-six months we have measured” describes thirty overlapping readings of one gentle decline — not thirty separate falls. How the headline figure is built is set out on our methodology page.

Biggest risers

Median price in the year to 31 July 2026, against the year before.

ModelYear to Jul 2025Year to Jul 2026Change
Micro Precision Products (MPP) Microcord Mk II£28n = 4£78n = 4+178.6%
Bolex H16 Reflex£600n = 7£1,300n = 5+116.7%
Leitz I (A)£434n = 14£857n = 6+97.6%
Corfield (K.G.) Corfield 66£88n = 6£145n = 4+64.2%
Leitz Leicaflex£130n = 10£209n = 12+61.4%
Mamiya Press£138n = 9£220n = 5+59.4%
Leitz R4S£95n = 7£150n = 5+57.9%
Leitz IIf£200n = 5£305n = 4+52.5%
Zeiss Ikon Contarex Bullseye£175n = 6£250n = 8+42.9%
Nikon FM£85n = 22£120n = 11+42.0%
Olympus OM-4£88n = 9£124n = 10+40.9%
Olympus XA-2£50n = 12£69n = 9+38.0%
Olympus Mju II£168n = 10£225n = 11+34.3%
Minolta X-700£55n = 13£72n = 4+30.9%
Leitz M2£753n = 10£985n = 6+30.8%

Biggest fallers

ModelYear to Jul 2025Year to Jul 2026Change
Voigtlander& Sohn Bessamatic£79n = 6£30n = 5−62.0%
Yashica Yashica-Mat 124 G£225n = 4£100n = 4−55.6%
Leitz R8£328n = 4£147n = 6−55.1%
Mamiya RB67£482n = 6£245n = 4−49.1%
Leitz Ic£362n = 5£208n = 6−42.5%
Leitz Leicaflex SL£180n = 21£106n = 9−41.1%
Rollei 35 B£50n = 6£30n = 4−40.0%
Canon AV-1£69n = 7£42n = 4−39.1%
Rollei Rolleiflex 3.5F£625n = 16£400n = 6−36.0%
Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta£60n = 11£39n = 8−35.0%
Nikon Nikkormat FT£38n = 7£25n = 5−34.2%
Nikon NIKONOS V£219n = 4£144n = 6−34.1%
Canon EOS 5D Mark II£240n = 5£160n = 5−33.3%
Rollei Rolleiflex Automat (MX-sync.) (Type 1)£175n = 4£119n = 4−32.0%
Olympus mju-1£88n = 9£60n = 9−31.8%

Median price by brand

Brands with at least 30 sales in each period. This is the median of everything the brand sold, so it moves with the mix of models coming up as well as with prices — a year heavy in ordinary bodies pulls it down. The model tables above are matched model by model.

BrandYear to Jul 2025Year to Jul 2026Change
Leitz£345n = 386£262n = 301−24.1%
Nikon£150n = 376£120n = 291−20.0%
Canon£88n = 217£101n = 165+14.8%
Olympus£70n = 218£75n = 160+7.1%
Rollei£162n = 169£188n = 114+16.0%
Asahi Pentax£75n = 106£75n = 840.0%
Zeiss Ikon£81n = 107£75n = 75−7.4%
Mamiya£178n = 80£275n = 70+54.9%
Hasselblad£1,000n = 101£973n = 58−2.8%
Kodak£70n = 39£62n = 55−11.4%
Yashica£75n = 47£38n = 49−49.3%
Voigtlander& Sohn£100n = 62£81n = 44−19.0%
Contax£260n = 31£106n = 43−59.2%
Minolta£56n = 138£56n = 31+0.9%

The index over time

The same measure at each month end: the twelve months ending then against the twelve before. Neighbouring points share eleven months, so the line moves smoothly — read the direction, not the step. Each point shows the number of models behind it, and the series starts where that number is large enough to read.

Twelve months toChangeBarModels
April 2024 −5.8% 41
May 2024 −8.6% 44
June 2024 +6.7% 44
July 2024 +2.5% 47
August 2024 −7.0% 52
September 2024 −9.0% 56
October 2024 −7.4% 60
November 2024 −8.8% 63
December 2024 −5.1% 66
January 2025 −5.4% 70
February 2025 0.0% 75
March 2025 −3.7% 81
April 2025 0.0% 79
May 2025 −2.5% 84
June 2025 0.0% 82
July 2025 −0.5% 82
August 2025 +4.2% 81
September 2025 −3.3% 91
October 2025 −4.9% 99
November 2025 −5.7% 97
December 2025 −7.0% 96
January 2026 −3.3% 101
February 2026 0.0% 106
March 2026 −5.3% 102
April 2026 −7.2% 100
May 2026 −7.2% 100
June 2026 −6.9% 91
July 2026 −5.7% 82

How this is calculated

The index covers cameras sold at UK auction, in pounds with the buyer’s premium taken out. Current period: 1 August 2025 to 31 July 2026. Prior period: 1 August 2024 to 31 July 2025.

For every model with at least 4 sales in each period we take the median price in each, and divide one by the other. The headline is the median of those ratios across all 82 models.

Comparing each model with itself is the point. A plain median of everything sold would move whenever the mix of what came to market changed — one Leica-heavy season would read as a rising market. Matching model to model removes that, on the same reasoning as a repeat-sales house price index.

The full method — which sales count, the thresholds, and what the index doesn’t adjust for — is on the methodology page.

What this can’t tell you

Five things, and we would rather say them than have you find them.

  • Condition is not controlled for. We don’t yet grade condition consistently enough to hold it constant, so a model whose better examples happened to come up this year will look as if it rose. This is the largest single weakness in the figure.
  • The salerooms we see changed. Our coverage is not a fixed panel, and a house joining or leaving shifts what we observe whatever prices do. The counts are below.
  • Not every saleroom publishes the same figure. Some publish the hammer price, some the price with the buyer’s premium. The index takes the premium out first, at each house’s rate for the date of the sale, so our figure for a lot can differ from the one the house published. See the methodology page.
  • eBay is left out, and so is everything not in pounds. A marketplace sale is a different kind of transaction from a saleroom lot, our eBay record begins partway through these periods, and the index doesn’t convert currencies. Including them would measure our own coverage rather than the market.
  • Lenses are left out. Some lens records still group optics by line rather than by single lens, so a lens figure would track which focal length happened to sell. Lenses join the index when that is fixed, not before.

Salerooms behind these figures

SaleroomPrior periodCurrent period
Flints Auctions1,9231,998
Special Auction Services951776
Chiswick Auctions426157
Harperfield Auctions3300
Tennants Auctioneers7343
David Duggleby5313
Cullens of Surrey520
London Camera & Antique Auction05

Citing this edition

cameraworth, The UK Vintage Camera Price Index — August 2026. Published 16 August 2026. https://www.cameraworth.com/reports/2026-08/

You are welcome to use these figures with a link back. This edition is sealed — its numbers will not change under a citation. For a cut of the data we don’t publish here, ask: info@cameraworth.com.